Well, this wasn't good enough for our neighbor. He decided to appeal the
decision to the Bedford County Zoning Board. The meeting to hear his appeal
was last night. Basically, the lawyers he hired had decided they would appeal
on the grounds of 6 key points - mainly concerning buildings that have been reconstructed, altered, moved, etc. These points were written to be against the
airport and the dragstrip, which in our opinion is one entity.
Our neighbor’s lawyers started out the meeting saying that he had nothing
against the airport. This was only against the dragstrip. Then through the
course of the night, all we hear from them are complaints of the noise. Those
6 points didn't even come up!
They claim that we've increased racing so much now then from the time we were
grandfathered that our grandfathered status should not be kept- we've changed
too much they're alleging.
Testimony
from several racers stated that cars are much quieter now then back in the
60’s and 70’s.
Their only proof of this was a newspaper article from 1989 stating we opened
our gates 8 times a year. Well, we all know newspapers never get anything
wrong... (No offense.)
Their other so called proof was a letter allowing current and future owners of
New London to draw water from a pond located on a parcel of land that New
London had sold to our neighbor. The letter stated that we were allowed to
draw water for 8 events. The lawyers were claiming this meant that our
neighbor had an agreement with New London that we would only have 8 races a
year. Our secretary who worked the corporation that owns New London then and
still does now stated that the number 8 was strictly how many times we could
draw water, not how many races we would agree to have.
Our
records show that what they defined as 8 races in 1989, were all multiple day
events. Typically a Saturday and Sunday race 8 times a year. This would
obviously equal out to 16 days of racing. In 2007, we held 10 Sunday races and
3 T & T’s- total of 13 race days.
All the testimony we heard from our supporters who have been racing at New
London since it's opening in the early 1960's painted a picture of racing
every weekend in the beginning, then every other weekend as it is now.
All
along, the saying has been that our grandfathered clause was granted in
October of 1989 when Bedford County began a program abbreviated
"LUGS" (Land Use Guidance System). LUGS was replaced in 1998 by our
Zoning system that we now have. The board decided that without being sure of
what the guidelines for LUGS would have been in 1989 that they should rule
with 1998 in mind.
Remember, the burden of proof to prove the zoning administrator’s decision
invalid was on our neighbor and his lawyers. They needed to prove that we have
changed so drastically since being grandfathered that we should no longer be
grandfathered. They simply couldn't do this. At 9:42 last night, the meeting
was officially closed. All 7 members voted to support the Bedford County
Zoning Administrator’s decision that we were in compliance with our
grandfathered status and had in fact not changed drastically over the years.
One small victory for us in a war that we're sure isn't over yet... our
neighbor’s next step would be circuit court, if he decides to appeal again.